| |

chinadaily.com.cn
 
 
 
  Home
  News Update
  Theory Defined
  Achievements
  China in Statistics
  China in Pictures
  Party History
  Party Leaders
  Party Structure
  Party in My Eyes
  Local Elections
  Reader Comments
  Editorial
 

  16th Party Congress  
     
     
 

Higher speed, less guzzling (06/26/2002)

When analyzing the relationship between one country's gross domestic product (GDP) growth and rise in energy consumption, some economists tend to empirically assume a fixed correlation between the two elements based on the data of previous years, make calculations of the ratio, and use it to measure discrepancies between the two figures.

If there is no great changes in economic structure, technology and management mode during the period, such a methodology of analysis and the result are likely to be correct.

Otherwise, when the object under analysis is shifting, it is erroneous to fixate the energy-output ratio.

Just as some overseas analysts have pointed out, towards the end of the Eighth Five-Year Plan (1991-95), the development of China's national economy still depended on an extensive growth mode characterized by huge investment, high energy consumption and low efficiency.

However, during the Ninth Five-Year Plan period (1996-2000), with deepening enterprise reforms, industrial restructuring, technology advancement and improved management, the ratio of energy use to economic growth declined sharply.

First, the energy consumption of industries with high unit energy use undertook a drastic fall.

Although the total energy consumption during 1997-2000 posted negative growth rate of -0.8, -4.1, -1.6 and -1.6 respectively, the production volume of major energy users soared. These include sectors such as electric power generation, metallurgy, building materials, chemistry and fertilizer manufacturing.

For example, during the same period, the total electricity generated saw an annual percentage growth rate of 5, 2.7, 6.2 and 9.4 respectively. The cement production rose at annual percentage rates of 4.2, 4.7, 6.9, and 4.2 respectively.

According to the analysis of Thomas G. Rawski, an economics professor at University of Pittsburgh, if energy consumption drops, there should be an astute output decrease in industries with high energy intensity.

But, in fact - except the production of coal and coke dropping - most industrial products still maintained a rapid growth rate.

The factors responsible for the phenomenon of decreased energy consumption coinciding with increased industrial output are the following:

During the Ninth Five-Year Plan period, a cluster of small power conversion stations and mills of cement and glass, with backward technology and obsolete equipment, were closed. The efforts helped to reduce the number of factories with low energy efficiency.

Technology upgrading and improved management of energy consumption have led to big energy savings.

Thus, any assumption of a fixed ratio of energy use to GDP growth will be a denial of the country's efforts to facilitate institutional reform, develop technology and improve management.

Besides, China's industrial restructuring plays a huge role in bringing down overall energy consumption.

The added value of the primary sector, agriculture, fell from 20.5 per cent of the GDP in 1995 to 15.2 per cent last year. Meanwhile, the GDP added value of the tertiary industry climbed to 33.7 per cent last year from 30.7 per cent in 1995.

It is no doubt that business, medical care, finance, telecommunication and real estate sectors consume far less energy than the industrial sector. As their added value accounts for a growing share of the GDP, the energy use level of the comprehensive GDP is lowered.

Moreover, within the industry, those energy-saving labour and technology-intensive sectors, such as mobile telecommunication equipment and electronic computer manufacturing, saw remarkable two-digit growth rates between 1996-2001. This also led to increased added value accompanied by energy savings.

Such strategies have brought two big changes in the national economy.

One is that many treasury-funded projects, such as road and railway construction, irrigation and environment construction, have absorbed much idle labour.

Second, redundant rural labour flowed to urban areas and engaged in the construction, cleaning, gardening, garbage-collecting and many other community-oriented service sectors.

Thus, part of the idle labour that did not generate any GDP in the past now created wealth. And the GDP generated by such services required little energy.

Another factor that can help to explain GDP growth accompanied by a decline in energy use is that the government is pursuing an environment protection policy in adjusting energy structure.

During the Ninth Five-Year Plan period, central heating was popularized in many large and medium-sized cities. More households quit coal burning and turned to natural liquid gas or electricity.

Such efforts have resulted in a sharp decline in coal consumption while the demand for oil, gas and electricity climbed rapidly.

From the perspective of energy consumption mix, the total volume of energy consumed decreased to 1.28 billion tons in 2000 from the 1.389 billion tons in 1996. And the share of coal usage dropped from 74.7 per cent to 67 per cent.

The increasing share of oil, natural gas and hydra-electricity contributes to increased heat efficiency.

Another argument that Rawski raised was that air passenger miles rose by only 2.2 per cent on domestic routes during 1998-1999. He believed, as the figure was far below the GDP growth rate at the time, the GDP growth rate would have been inflated.

But the reality is, during the period, big strides were made in raising railway transportation speed, and on many key routes an overnight rail trip will take passengers to another big city more than a thousand kilometres away.

Besides, the construction of expressways has been accelerated and traffic mileage expanded with huge projects funded by treasury bonds.

As a result, many passengers who used to travel on a one to two-hour flight now turn to the railway and road travel - the real factor responsible for the slow-down of the growth rate of air-travelling passengers.

Some scholars also cited the decline in freight volume as an argument for their doubts for China's economic growth statistics.

However, such a view is also biased.

In view of the transportation mix, the freight volume posted growth rates between 1997-2000 of 1.6, -0.9, 2, and 5.3 respectively. Meanwhile, the growth rate of passenger volumes was 6.5, 3.9, 1.1 and 6.2 respectively.

The decrease of freight volume can be partly explained by the drop in coal consumption and, hence, less transportation.

And the increased passenger volume tells that increasingly more surplus labour in rural areas migrates to cities. The human resource, to some extent, substitutes the role of material resources in the contribution to GDP.

The author is a scholar of the Research Office with the Party School of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.

 
     
     
  Forum ... ...  
     
 

Jiang Zemin, in his report to the 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, said the Party's door is open to all positive factors of the society, including private entrepreneurs, foreign-invested firm employees, self-employed businessmen and freelance professionals, he also said that the Party should advance with the times. What's your opinion?

 
     
  see comments  
     
  Related ...  
     
    HKSAR Five Years  
    Party 80th Anniversary  
    Key Documents  
    China in Brief  
    China's Taiwan  
    China's Tibet  
     
     
     
     
  Copyright 2002 By chinadaily.com.cn. All rights reserved